The Global Regulatory Pulse report for Q4 highlights the dynamic and evolving nature of financial regulation across major jurisdictions. From the emphasis on accountability and transparency in Singapore and Hong Kong to the strategic focus on sustainable finance and technological innovation in the European Union, regulatory bodies are actively shaping the future of financial markets. In the Middle East, initiatives like Project Aperta and the Open Finance Regulation underscore the UAE’s commitment to enhancing financial interoperability and competitiveness. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom’s FCA is fostering a more inclusive and transparent private market environment, and the United States continues to advance priorities, implement new rules, and enforce actions due to upcoming SEC changes.

APAC

Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)

Revisions to MAS Guidelines on Fair Dealing and the Increased Focus on Accountability Among Board and Senior Management Members

In May 2024, the MAS issued updated Guidelines on Fair Dealing, whose key change is an expanded scope of application to all financial institutions (FIs) operating in Singapore. These guidelines are aimed at board members and senior management of such FIs, emphasizing the MAS’s expectations for their FIs to achieve five fair dealing outcomes. 

The MAS’s Guidelines on Individual Accountability and Conduct focuses heavily on designing and implementing robust supervisory structures with properly allocated roles and responsibilities among senior managers and material risk personnel, all overseen by the board. This is meaningfully reiterated by key MAS enforcement actions that exemplify the true weight of individual accountability when, for the worst offenders, CEOs and Directors are publicly reprimanded for the failures of their FIs

Revised Reporting Regime for Over-the-Counter Derivatives Contracts

On October 21, 2024, amendments to the MAS’s Securities and Futures (Reporting of Derivatives Contracts) Regulations 2013 (SF(RDC)R) to adopt technical revisions to the reporting requirements went into effect. From this date, reporting under the MAS’s OTCD Reporting Regime now are required to incorporate critical data elements to facilitate the international standardization of data elements reported across OTCD reporting regimes around the world.

Continued Focus by the MAS on Strengthening of AML/CFT Measures in FIs’ Compliance Frameworks

In October 2024, the MAS published its AML/CFT Supervisory Expectations from Recent Inspections, an information paper stemming from a series of recent MAS inspections on FIs. The MAS’s efforts continue a longstanding focus on the prevention and mitigation of money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing risks that arise from activities conducted by FIs in Singapore. In the publication, the MAS noted five key areas of supervisory expectations: (i) Ensuring suitable assessment of customer risks is completed; (ii) Exercising vigilance in identification of material red flags; (iii) Establishing customers’ sources of wealth and/or sources of funds sufficiently, as required; (iv) Implementing appropriate risk mitigation measures; and (v) Conducting holistic monitoring of customer accounts.

Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission

Regulatory Development

In a significant move to enhance the regulatory landscape, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has published guidelines for market soundings, particularly relevant for block trades. These guidelines apply to confidential information about potential transactions in listed securities and those affecting their prices. Buy-side firms must safeguard the confidentiality of market-sounding information and ensure there are effective barriers to prevent inadvertent disclosure, misuse, or leakage of confidential information. Sell-side brokers must use standardized scripts, provide anonymous preliminary information, and maintain a list of individuals with nonpublic information.

Asset Management Oversight

The SFC released a circular addressing critical deficiencies and misconduct among asset managers. The SFC plans to conduct thematic on-site inspections to identify breaches. Key issues highlighted include ineffective management of conflicts of interest, insufficient risk management and investment due diligence, inadequate disclosure of material information, and inappropriate valuation methodologies. The circular serves as a reminder for asset managers to strengthen their compliance and governance practices to better protect investor interests.

Market Misconduct and Insider Trading

Over the past year, we have seen an uptick in cases of insider trading and market misconduct.

Since October 2024, the SFC has taken significant enforcement actions against various individuals and companies for insider trading and market misconduct, including ramp-and-dump schemes, conspiracy to defraud related to share options, and alleged insider dealing and delayed disclosure of inside information regarding a major acquisitions. These cases underscore the SFC's commitment to ensuring fair and transparent financial markets.

European Union

ESMA 2025 Work Programme

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published its 2025 Annual Work Programme on October 1, 2024. The Work Programme is structured around ESMA’s strategy for 2023–2028. This strategy has three strategic priorities and two thematic drivers.

Strategic Priorities:

  • Fostering effective markets and financial stability.
  • Strengthening supervision of EU financial markets.
  • Enhancing protection of retail investors.'

Thematic Drivers:

  • Enabling sustainable finance.
  • Facilitating technological innovation and effective use of data.

The Work Programme is extensive, which is to be expected given ESMA’s broad mandate. We have selected some highlights below that will be of interest to regulated firms.

Irish Funds Sector Review

On October 22, 2024, the Department of Finance in Ireland published its final report after a review of the Irish funds sector. The review was initiated by the Minister for Finance in 2023 and sought the views of the industry and consumers. The review aimed to ensure that Ireland maintained its leading position in asset management and funds servicing. The review also sought to ensure that Ireland’s funds sector framework is resilient, future-proofed, supportive of financial stability and a continued example of international best practice.

The review contains 42 recommendations across nine areas, including the promotion of retail investment, technology, the regulatory and supervision regime, and legal and product structures. With the recent election in Ireland, it will be up to a new government to take these recommendations forward in 2025.

Middle East 

The Central Bank of the UAE

Project Aperta Initiative

The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) announced the Project Aperta initiative, which aims to connect open finance infrastructures of multiple jurisdictions to advance UAE’s cross-border interoperability for financial institutions and businesses. CBUAE will work with international central banks and financial regulators to minimize obstacles that businesses face when obtaining trade finance products to facilitate trade.

Open Finance Regulation

CBUAE issued the Open Finance Regulation to ensure the efficiency of open finance services, enhance competitiveness, achieve consumers’ interests and reinforce UAE’s status as a leading financial technology hub. The framework facilitates financial institutions’ ability to access and use consumers’ financial data to create personalized experiences and tailor offerings to their needs.

Exemptions to VAT

The UAE has amended its value-added tax law to exempt investment fund management services and certain virtual assets services, increasing its appeal as a leading investment hub.

National Summit on Financial Crime Compliance

CBUAE held the National Summit on Financial Crime Compliance which witnessed participation of local and international experts and decision-makers from regulatory bodies and law enforcement authorities. The summit highlighted UAE’s ongoing commitment to safeguarding the integrity of the global financial system and strengthening the legal/regulatory framework to adapt to the changing risk environment.

Financial Services Regulatory Authority/ Abu Dhabi Global Market

Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) is becoming known for its innovative fintech and sustainable finance initiatives. ADGM Registration Authority (RA) recently published the Monitoring & Enforcement Strategy and Regulatory Priorities 2024/25 report, which highlights its commitment to continually enhancing ADGM’s reputation as a credible and attractive jurisdiction.

The report includes RA’s regulatory strategy and sheds light on the supervisory focus areas for the 2024–2025 period: to promote compliance and provide a level playing field for all licensed persons. The RA’s regulatory priorities over the next 12 months are:

Regulatory Priorities
Priority 1
Promote accuracy, timeliness and quality of annual filings and license renewals.
Priority 2
Promote high standards of audit quality and corporate reporting.
Priority 3
Conduct risk-based supervision.
Priority 4
Promote high standards of beneficial ownership compliance.
Priority 5
Deliver effective oversight of distributed ledger technology foundations.
Priority 6
Facilitate and promote reporting related to environmental, social and governance (ESG).
Priority 7
Identify contraventions to operate without a valid license, exceeding license scope and false claims about license status/type.
Priority 8
Ensure timely, decisive and proportionate enforcement action is taken.

Dubai Financial Services Authority/Dubai International Financial Centre

Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) continues to lead in banking and financial advisory services cementing its position as an attractive and business-friendly financial hub with strong regulatory oversight.

Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) released two consultation papers in an effort to amend, clarify and propose changes to the Client Assets Regime and Prudential Requirements based on supervisory experience and comparisons with other jurisdictions, as well as to ensure that requirements are proportionate to the complexity, size and risk profile of the authorized firms. DFSA has invited comments to promote transparent communication with the authorized firms to enhance its regulatory framework.

Securities and Commodities Authority

Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) signed a cooperation agreement with Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) to bolster the UAE’s position as a leading global hub for virtual assets in alignment with the government’s directives to regulate the sector, control its activities and enhance overall monitoring to protect investors. Virtual asset service providers operating or wishing to operate in Dubai require a license from VARA and can register with SCA to service the wider UAE.

United Kingdom and Channel Islands

Shortly before Halloween, Nikhil Rathi, Chief Executive of the UK FCA addressed the Investment Association Annual Dinner. During his speech, he discussed a topic that has long been a concern for the regulator: private markets.

While a regulator discussing private equity and credit is not exactly new, the tone of the speech was remarkably different. Rather than taking a hesitant and arguably adversarial approach to private markets, the FCA is now, if not fully embracing the sector, then certainly making overtures.

The growth of the overall private market is well known and Rathi quoted estimates for the global private capital AUM to be more than $14 trillion, approximately triple what it was a decade ago. The UK private market assets under management (AUM) are thought to have almost trebled in roughly the same time period. But the chief executive made a clear comparison to the U.S. where the SEC chairperson, Gary Gensler, recently stated that roughly $30 trillion of debt financing for non-financial corporations came from the U.S. capital markets versus $2.8 trillion from U.S. banks.

Of course, banks have historically been the main providers of capital, though the gap between bank lending and capital markets has narrowed over time. It is this changing dynamic that has concerned regulators as those risks move outside the banking industry. Private markets players have long championed their offering because they have direct lenders able to weather credit events and work closely with borrowers to rectify issues. Banks are held to significantly different prudential requirements.

Rathi has now acknowledged that the focus of international regulatory frameworks was on the worry and fear of those risks moving into the asset management space. Those fears have become especially acute with the growing democratization of private assets and the embracing of the private sector to fund large-scale infrastructure projects by the new Labour government. While the regulator obviously cannot ignore this transference of risk, clamping down on those new providers of capital would limit their capacity to do business. Such a move often inadvertently creates substantial barriers to entry and would miss a growth opportunity that could be sorely needed.

Perhaps now, at least in the UK, private markets are faced with a regulator that is open to engaging in constructive discussions about the risks involved in this sector and where, truly, those risks reside. The regulatory call for greater transparency persists, though the change in tone may lead to clarity in what information is needed. Rathi’s acknowledgment of inherent liquidity risks suggests an acceptance that “caveat emptor” should apply when investing, and if a retail investor, armed with appropriate information, chooses to invest in a product with a long-term lockup period, then that risk sits with that individual.

Despite oblique references to collateralized loan obligations, the overall message feels inclusive but tinged with caution. There have been false dawns before in the history of private market and regulator interactions, but these moves by the current head of the FCA could mark the start of a new level of engagement.

JFSC Addresses Compliance Professional Recruitment and Retention Challenges

One of the key challenges faced by offshore financial centers is the recruitment and retention of compliance professionals. At the start of Q4, the Jersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC) released a consultation paper focused on the challenges faced in Jersey regarding key person (MLRO/MLCO/CO) recruitment and retention.

With the move to centralizing or outsourcing compliance functions for efficiency or skills reasons, the JFSC is seeking views on whether key persons should be employed directly by financial services businesses (as opposed to outsourcing to third parties), whether these key persons should be Jersey residents, or whether the status quo should be maintained. There are inherent tensions with all versions of operating models, but it remains to be seen whether Jersey will relax its requirements in the face of operational constraints in the local market.

United States

The U.S. SEC continued to advance programmatic priorities, new rules, and enforcement actions in the wake of looming changes in the SEC administration. The SEC recently announced that Chair Gensler will depart from the SEC effective January 20, 2025.

SEC Division of Examinations 2025 Priorities and Risk Alert

The SEC Division of Examinations (Exam Division) demonstrated a proactive start to the 2025 fiscal year. In October 2024, the Exam Division announced its 2025 fiscal year examination priorities that notify the industry about the compliance areas that the Exam Division staff are likely to focus on in the coming year. The Exam Division Acting Director aptly summarized these priorities at the SEC’s 2024 National Compliance Outreach Seminar as both continuing to examine traditional areas and “examining for compliance with newly effective rules, looking ahead of changes in technology, dealing with some of the same cyber issues that each of you face every day, and considering the implication of recent advances in crypto assets and artificial intelligence.” Furthermore, in early November 2024, the Exam Division issued a risk alert that shared how the Exam Division generally conducts examinations of registered investment companies and summarized observations made in past examinations.

SEC Rule 13f-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Form SHO

To strengthen market oversight and prevent market manipulation, the SEC introduced a new regulation effective January 2025 that requires institutional investment managers to disclose certain month-end short positions and related short daily activity. The thresholds for reporting depend on whether the short position relates to an equity security of a reporting or non-reporting entity. For a reporting issuer, the threshold equals or exceeds $10 million or 2.5% or more of shares outstanding. For a non-reporting issuer, the threshold is if the gross short position equals or exceeds $500,000 at the close of any settlement date during the month. The practical implications are that institutional investment managers who meet these disclosure thresholds must submit a Form SHO on the 14th of each month reflecting specific data concerning the short positions, sales, and underlying securities.

SEC - Custody Violations

The SEC Division of Enforcement (Enforcement Division) completed its 2024 fiscal year with thematic focus areas that included six cases in September 2024 alone alleging custody deficiencies and related compliance program failures. For example, in Nebari Partners, LLC , the SEC alleged that a registered investment advisor violated Rule 206(4)-2 of the Advisers Act for failing to audit and timely deliver audited financial statements to investors of funds managed by related persons. In another example, in SuRo Capital Corp., the SEC alleged that a registered investment company violated Rule 17(f) of the Investment Company Act for failing to properly place securities with a qualified custodian per agreement and board approval. These cases underscore that safety and custody of investor assets remain a core priority area. SEC registrants should be vigilant about strict adherence to custody requirements as the SEC does not have to allege bad faith to prove custody-related violations.

Takeaways

U.S. market participants should not assume that the SEC will halt or slow pursuit of the agency’s mandates and priorities during this transition period to a new administration. As SEC registrants are preparing audited financial statements for this fiscal year, they should be diligent in ensuring compliance with their custody-related obligations.

How Kroll Can Help

Kroll’s expertise in Financial Services Compliance and Regulation is evident in our ability to navigate these complex regulatory landscapes. Our tailored approach ensures that each client receives solutions that address their unique challenges and requirements. By leveraging our deep industry knowledge and global reach, we help financial institutions enhance their compliance frameworks, mitigate risks, and achieve regulatory excellence. This report underscores our commitment to delivering insightful, actionable intelligence that empowers our clients to stay ahead in an ever-evolving regulatory environment. As we continue to monitor and analyze regulatory developments, Kroll remains dedicated to supporting our clients with the highest standards of compliance and regulatory advisory services.

 

Sources:
For more information on DORA please see the previous edition of the Global Regulatory Pulse

Sign Up for Kroll's Global Regulatory Pulse Newsletter

From policy changes to enforcement actions, stay informed and prepared for the evolving regulatory landscape.

U.S. Financial Services Compliance and Regulation

Navigate the ever-changing U.S. financial regulatory environment with confidence. Kroll provides unparalleled expertise in SEC, FINRA, NFA and CFTC regulations, helping clients mitigate risks, maintain current compliance programs and confidently overcome regulatory challenges.

UK Financial Services Compliance and Regulation Solutions

The UK regulatory landscape is constantly evolving, with new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) initiatives introduced and working practices regularly updated at a European level.

Middle East Financial Services Compliance and Regulation Solutions

Kroll’s Financial Services Compliance and Regulation experts help clients build, manage and protect their businesses both in the United Arab Emirates and more broadly in the Middle East.


Managed Compliance Software

Automate routine compliance tasks and stay ahead of risk with Kroll’s regulatory expertise.

Financial Services Compliance and Regulation

End-to-end governance, advisory and monitorship solutions to detect, mitigate, drive efficiencies and remediate operational, legal, compliance and regulatory risk.

DORA Compliance Assessment

Are you ready for DORA compliance? Understand your gaps and build long-term digital and operational resilience.